Using Watson Criteria for Analyzing Student Errors: Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

Aswin Aswin, Dadang Juandi

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the distribution of research related to the use of the Watson criteria in analyzing student errors at all levels of education. The method used is Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The sample consists of 42 results of qualitative research on the use of Watson's criteria in analyzing student errors. Samples were taken from indexed journals published in the 2017-2021 period. The key question of this research is how the description of the distribution of research related to the use of the Watson criteria in analyzing student errors, is reviewed based on the year of publication, level of research, methods used, number of subjects, types of questions, demographics, and types of errors made by students. Through the SLR method, it was found that there was an increase and decrease in the number of studies over the last five years. Based on the criteria for junior high school level studies, the use of descriptive qualitative methods, using story questions, with less than 30 subjects, and the demographics of research on the island of Java are the most dominant. The most dominant student errors are procedural errors and missing conclusions. This becomes very important to be considered in learning mathematics.


Keywords


Student Error; Watson Criteria; SLR

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aliyah, U., & Mulawarman, M. (2020). Kajian Systematic Literature Review (SLR) Untuk Mengidentifikasi Dampak Terorisme, Layanan Konseling dan Terapi Trauma Pada Anak-Anak. ISLAMIC COUNSELING Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 4(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.29240/jbk.v4i2.1759

Dazrullisa, & Hadi, K. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson. Gentamulia, XII(2), 73–88.

Dewi, M. A. K., Trapsilasiwi, D., Yurdianto, E., Sugiarti, T., & Pambudi, D. S. (2019). Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika dan Gender. I Jurnal Online Internasional & Nasional, 10(1), 56–67. www.journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id

Dwidarti, U., Mampouw, H. L., & Setyadi, D. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Materi Himpunan. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v3i2.110

Iskandar, R. S. F., & Juandi, D. (2022). Study Literature Review : Realistic Mathematics Education Learning on Students ’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 6(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v6i

Islam, S. N., Susilawati, W., & Sugilar, H. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berpikir Abstraksi Matematis Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson. Jurnal Perspektif, 5(1), 112–129.

Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogeneity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108

Karimawati, K., Syahbana, A., & Nopriyanti, T. D. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Berdasarkan Prosedur Watson dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Lingkaran Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP Darul Aitam Palembang. Laplace : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.31537/laplace.v4i1.463

Karlina, A. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kalkulus Diferensial Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v7i2.128

Khalaf, B. K., & Zin, Z. B. M. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a

Munawaroh, N., Rohaeti, E. E., & Aripin, U. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Kategori Kesalahan Menurut Watson Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Komunikasi Matematis. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(5), 993–1004. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/jpmi/article/view/1870

Oktavianingsih, C., Maharani, A., & Wahyuni, I. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Barisan dan Deret Berdasarkan Kategori Watson. Gema Wiralodra, 10(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.31943/gemawiralodra.v10i2.81

Paladang, K. K., Indriani, S., & Dirgantoro, K. P. S. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Kelas VIII SLH Medan dalam Mengerjakan Soal Matematika Materi Fungsi Ditinjau dari Prosedur Newman. JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 1(2), 93–103.

Pramesti, S. L. D. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Boarding School Berdasarkan Model Cipp. Integral: Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 17–32. https://e-journal.umc.ac.id/index.php/JNR/article/view/1139

Rahayu, G. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Sma Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Trigonometri Berbasis Kemampuan Penalaran Menggunakan Kategori Kesalahan Watson. Journal On Education, 01(03), 267–274.

Saputri, R. R., Sugiarti, T., Murtikusuma, R. P., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Yudianto, E. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Fungsi Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender Siswa SMP Kelas Viii. Kadikma, 9(2), 59–68.

Sarwoedi. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson. Matematics paedagogic, IV(1), 12–22.

Suciati, I., & Wahyuni, D. S. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Pada Operasi Hitung Pecahan Pada Siswa Kelas V Sdn Pengawu. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 11(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v11i2.3760

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Werla Putra, G., & Iswara, B. (2019). Systematic Literature Review Method for Identifying Platforms and Methods for Information System Development in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63.

Widiyanto, J. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Pertama). UNIPMA PRESS.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v4i1.7239

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2022 Aswin Aswin, Dadang Juandi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Indexed by

doaj

doaj.pnggoogle_scholar_2-removebg-preview.pngmoraref-removebg-preview.png

dimension-removebg-preview.pngWorldCat_Logo_H_Color-removebg-preview.png

garuda-removebg-preview.png

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats